I am finding that the older I get, the more empathy I have for just how little each person’s world is. Whether an individual’s solace lies in a warm cup of coffee or a glass of gin to a fancy luxury car, a trophy wife, or a ph’D. They are all equal in terms of smallness and inconsequence. Don’t get me wrong. This is not a statement made in arrogance. Friends of mine will tell you that my world is probably the smallest one of them all. Make-belief villages in a glass snow globe will probably think themselves urbane compared to my very limited world. I guess that’s why I can sympathize.
The upshot of this is that once I “see” these important things as surface acquisitions, I begin to ask, “what isn’t superficial?” And THAT, is where the journey begins. Personally, I think that which isn’t cosmetic, is, by definition, invisible. Off the bat, I can think of a few things. The search for quality is one. Striving for quality is putting the concept of evolution to good use. Do we complacently accept the comfortable status quo around us, or do we advance the generation by a notch, and do things better than the way our ancestors did them?
The search for love is another. Sure, skeptics will wonder, in a post-structural question mark, whether we love using the definition of love, love what attracted our eyes first, or “make do” simply because we have ran out of choices and are too embarrassed to admit it, so we heighten that choice to the lofty reaches of this abstract emotion. In defense of love, I have come across many variations of love – some merely between brother and sister, mother and daughter, or boy and pet. There are really no “choices” involved there.
I am uncomfortable with the fact that each of our personal universes are so small, but I also think that in knowing our vast limitations, we begin to question the notion of how happiness is created.



